**Big Whiskey and The GrooGrux King**

carter29 · Post by **carter29** » Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:01 pm

bense27 wrote:
tbillie41 wrote:
taparoo wrote:
Nitro1515 wrote:http://nab.broadcastnewsroom.com/articl ... ?id=105341

"...Less cymbal splash, more low end and a rock bottom that worked exactly the way I wanted in that room. I immediately knew I had it.”

I pointed out into the room at the two mics -- which ended up giving me about 80% of the total sound I wanted for the record.”
I'm probably reading into it WAY too much

Maybe he meant that he'd found that signature DMB sound. That old school, raw, open sound.
exactly what I meant

He seems like a high class producer, so hopefully a raw but clean sound. And hopefully there will be some volume flux, stand up was mono-tone in this sense (of course due to much help from complete mono-tone drums). But I find music is always better when the musician pays close attention to the volume for individual sections of songs (see damien rice)

Nitro1515 · Post by **Nitro1515** » Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:03 pm

carter29 wrote:
bense27 wrote:
tbillie41 wrote:
taparoo wrote:
Nitro1515 wrote:http://nab.broadcastnewsroom.com/articl ... ?id=105341

"...Less cymbal splash, more low end and a rock bottom that worked exactly the way I wanted in that room. I immediately knew I had it.”

I pointed out into the room at the two mics -- which ended up giving me about 80% of the total sound I wanted for the record.”
I'm probably reading into it WAY too much

Maybe he meant that he'd found that signature DMB sound. That old school, raw, open sound.
exactly what I meant
He seems like a high class producer, so hopefully a raw but clean sound. And hopefully there will be some volume flux, stand up was mono-tone in this sense (of course due to much help from complete mono-tone drums). But I find music is always better when the musician pays close attention to the volume for individual sections of songs (see damien rice)

What are you guys talking about? That article has no mention of Steve Vining the producer, it just a little tidbit with Steve Miller an engineer.

Coldchillin · Post by **Coldchillin** » Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:22 pm

carter29 · Post by **carter29** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:10 pm

well then

carter29 · Post by **carter29** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:10 pm

well then, im an idiot

Coldchillin · Post by **Coldchillin** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:36 pm

Kahn · Post by **Kahn** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:55 pm

Man I really hope this album is good. This is DMB's last chance at not sucking

Nitro1515 · Post by **Nitro1515** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:59 pm

I would be shocked if it was good

a1075dd63aa12 · Post by **a1075dd63aa12** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:00 pm

Nitro1515 wrote:I would be shocked if it was good

Beauford33 · Post by **Beauford33** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:07 pm

Id be even more shocked if Gianni didnt bitch a lot about it

bense27 · Post by **bense27** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:09 pm

Beauford33 wrote:Id be even more shocked if Gianni didnt bitch a lot about it

Nitro1515 · Post by **Nitro1515** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:11 pm

Beauford33 wrote:Id be even more shocked if Gianni didnt bitch a lot about it

You know I hope it does suck just so I can continue to bitch about it and piss you off

Beauford33 · Post by **Beauford33** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:14 pm

I wouldnt be surprised (about the part you actually wishing it did suck).

Kahn · Post by **Kahn** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:26 pm

I dont hope it sucks, I hope its BTCS part II.

Nitro1515 · Post by **Nitro1515** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:28 pm

I just hope its a solid album, like Busted Stuff. Nothing mind blowing, but an enjoyable record nonetheless.