judging solely on looks...

firedancer86 · Post by **firedancer86** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 3:20 pm

Taylors are a sophisticated sexy

Martins are teranical sea-hags

just my opinion...but Martins...gah! the bodies look like a box...the necks look like a plank...and the headstocks look like fly swatters

what is the deal there

8)

Pickles · Post by **Pickles** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 3:23 pm

well....... Taylors are beautiful in looks.... Martins... well.... theyre so so in looks... theyre just too.... i dunno.... boring. every Taylor looks different and unique... so awesome..

firedancer86 · Post by **firedancer86** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 3:27 pm

"yeah guys, lets take a cardboard box and tape a baseball bat to it and call it pretty"...

fatjack · Post by **fatjack** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 3:45 pm

looks dont matter at all. i'd take a guitar that looks like crap and sounds good over a pretty guitar that sounds shitty any day

firedancer86 · Post by **firedancer86** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 3:48 pm

fatjack wrote:a pretty guitar that sounds shitty any day

like an alverez

the thread name is about looks pop-eye...find another thread to be an ass in

fatjack · Post by **fatjack** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 3:51 pm

firedancer86 wrote:
fatjack wrote:a pretty guitar that sounds shitty any day
like an alverez

the thread name is about looks pop-eye...find another thread to be an ass in

ass? you think that's being an ass?

i could go on about your's and shane's unhealthy and unecessary obsession with taylors, but i actually DON'T wish to be an ass

maybe my guitar is ugly, but it sounds damn fine (you have said so yourself) and i only paid 500 dollars for mine

firedancer86 · Post by **firedancer86** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 4:01 pm

yeesh...I was joking

anyhow...Shane may have the problem, but I don't

I enjoy Taylor works, but its not unhealthy...yet

by te by, where is that from...your sig..I can almost remember it, but it is kiiling me

firedancer86 · Post by **firedancer86** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 4:04 pm

ah, nevermind...Identity

Jay · Post by **Jay** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 4:11 pm

this is my favorite guitar player joke...martin's sound beautiful but good god, they are all so ugly.

has anyone seen the silver martin? i saw one once...a big SILVER dreadnaught. looked like a baking tin.

Pickles · Post by **Pickles** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 6:59 pm

Jay wrote: this is my favorite guitar player joke...martin's sound beautiful but good god, they are all so ugly.

has anyone seen the silver martin? i saw one once...a big SILVER dreadnaught. looked like a baking tin.

if im thinking about the right one then thats the ugliest guitar ive ever seen.

and yes, i do have a problem. its called lack of money to buy all the Taylors i want

Beauford33 · Post by **Beauford33** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 7:04 pm

based on looks................I like the chet though the martains arent that bad. The taylors are damn beautiful too

thejoe · Post by **thejoe** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:23 pm

i love the way martin dreads look
i hate the taylor pickguards
love the koa taylors tho

Dancing Ants · Post by **Dancing Ants** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 11:16 pm

I like the OOO and OMs...

Taylors are very pretty, but the taylors I've played feel so...plastic...to me.

gravedigger · Post by **gravedigger** » Sat Dec 06, 2003 8:49 am

firedancer86 wrote:Taylors are a sophisticated sexy

Martins are teranical sea-hags

just my opinion...but Martins...gah! the bodies look like a box...the necks look like a plank...and the headstocks look like fly swatters

what is the deal there 8)

Martin D-45 is a beautiful thing.

Taylors are like $20 hookers. look nice on the outside and when you get 'em home all the do is suck.

DustyDave · Post by **DustyDave** » Sat Dec 06, 2003 9:15 am

firedancer86 wrote:"yeah guys, lets take a cardboard box and tape a baseball bat to it and call it pretty"...

DMBTabs.com

judging solely on looks...

judging solely on looks...

Re: judging solely on looks...