#41 acoustic

gravesRR7 · Post by **gravesRR7** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 4:18 pm

when i listen to this song on L@LC, when he starts the verse, he seems to be playing the chords in the intro. i think that when you play it solo, if you use the tab on this site that it sounds not full enough, like you should be hitting more strings. does anyone know if dave plays it different solo, or is it just me.

cave_cricket · Post by **cave_cricket** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 4:20 pm

gravesRR7 wrote:when i listen to this song on L@LC, when he starts the verse, he seems to be playing the chords in the intro. i think that when you play it solo, if you use the tab on this site that it sounds not full enough, like you should be hitting more strings. does anyone know if dave plays it different solo, or is it just me.

i believe he plays the same chords as on this site during the verse he just strums them more. he changes the rhythm up but with the same chords.

at least that's how i play it....

grock · Post by **grock** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 5:14 pm

Timmy is also all up in the mix. so he would probably just play the chords like in the intro if anybody does. so if it sounds full, rest assured that it is cuz of tim. Tim is the man.

gravedigger · Post by **gravedigger** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 9:25 pm

cave_cricket wrote:
i believe he plays the same chords as on this site during the verse he just strums them more. he changes the rhythm up but with the same chords.

at least that's how i play it....

oh my god we agree!!!

notes arn't the only thing that can "fill" the sound. strums, slaps, traps. ya know, the way Dave does it.

cave_cricket · Post by **cave_cricket** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 9:26 pm

gravedigger wrote:
cave_cricket wrote:
i believe he plays the same chords as on this site during the verse he just strums them more. he changes the rhythm up but with the same chords.

at least that's how i play it....
oh my god we agree!!! notes arn't the only thing that can "fill" the sound. strums, slaps, traps. ya know, the way Dave does it.

Grave...this may be the start of a beautiful friendship!

olkskoolpik · Post by **olkskoolpik** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 9:31 pm

whats trappin?

Brock · Post by **Brock** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 10:30 pm

See this thread for a little more explanation on trapping.

bugman96 · Post by **bugman96** » Thu Mar 13, 2003 12:15 pm

A few years ago I saw this tab for #41 on L@LC. I have no idea what website it was on.

I didn't include the picking or fills because I'm lazy.

Code: Select all

--3---2---3-------
--3---3---0---3---
--5--(4)--0---0---
--5---4---2---4---
--0---2---2---5---
----------0-------

4mbi3nt · Post by **4mbi3nt** » Thu Mar 13, 2003 12:33 pm

bugman96 wrote:A few years ago I saw this tab for #41 on L@LC. I have no idea what website it was on.

I didn't include the picking or fills because I'm lazy.
Code: Select all
--3---2---3-------
--3---3---0---3---
--5--(4)--0---0---
--5---4---2---4---
--0---2---2---5---
----------0-------

I think that tab came from nancies.org where all the tab is wrong including that one. At least that was my experience. In fact, that is how I found this site. I saw a post in their froum from kanter with a link.

Never been back there since.

bugman96 · Post by **bugman96** » Thu Mar 13, 2003 2:17 pm

4mbi3nt wrote: I think that tab came from nancies.org where all the tab is wrong including that one. At least that was my experience. In fact, that is how I found this site. I saw a post in their froum from kanter with a link. Never been back there since.

It is on nancies.org, but that's not where I saw it because I didn't go to nancies.org then. Regardless, I think what I posted sounds closer to the Luther College #41 than the normal way.

gravesRR7 · Post by **gravesRR7** » Thu Mar 13, 2003 11:48 pm

ok guys thank you very much, i guess i just need to practice, i should have known

billywestom · Post by **billywestom** » Fri Mar 14, 2003 1:57 am

bugman96 wrote:
4mbi3nt wrote: I think that tab came from nancies.org where all the tab is wrong including that one. At least that was my experience. In fact, that is how I found this site. I saw a post in their froum from kanter with a link. Never been back there since.
It is on nancies.org, but that's not where I saw it because I didn't go to nancies.org then. Regardless, I think what I posted sounds closer to the Luther College #41 than the normal way.

how could it possibly sound closer, when it's not the way he plays it? dave never "changes" the way he plays a song, as far as a complete change of chords. strumming, picking, slapping, that may change, but not the chords that he uses. this only happens when doing an album.

bugman96 · Post by **bugman96** » Fri Mar 14, 2003 7:52 pm

billywestom wrote: how could it possibly sound closer, when it's not the way he plays it? dave never "changes" the way he plays a song, as far as a complete change of chords. strumming, picking, slapping, that may change, but not the chords that he uses. this only happens when doing an album.

First, what I posted were not complete change of chords. They're the same chords, different voicings.

Second, have you ever asked Dave if he noodles around with different chord voicings while playing live?

Third, is it not possible that what I posted could be what Tim is playing on L@LC and could account for the "fullness" that the original poster was looking for?

Speenis · Post by **Speenis** » Fri Mar 14, 2003 9:18 pm

bugman96 wrote:
billywestom wrote: how could it possibly sound closer, when it's not the way he plays it? dave never "changes" the way he plays a song, as far as a complete change of chords. strumming, picking, slapping, that may change, but not the chords that he uses. this only happens when doing an album.

First, what I posted were not complete change of chords. They're the same chords, different voicings.

Second, have you ever asked Dave if he noodles around with different chord voicings while playing live?

Third, is it not possible that what I posted could be what Tim is playing on L@LC and could account for the "fullness" that the original poster was looking for?

1. NO 2. YES

bugman96 · Post by **bugman96** » Fri Mar 14, 2003 9:25 pm

BigSpeen3436 wrote:1. NO 2. YES

Whatever; it still sounds good regardless of whether or not it's the "right" way.

DMBTabs.com

#41 acoustic

#41 acoustic

Re: #41 acoustic

Re: #41 acoustic

Re: #41 acoustic