Lowend taylors sound so gooodd...

mangold · Post by **mangold** » Sun Dec 19, 2004 7:04 pm

SteelstrungHero wrote:I have to say, I've owned two 314ces now, and I honestly like the sound of the 314s over the sound of the many higher end models I've played (7-8-914ces, 4-910s, you name it).

to be honest the nicest taylor ive played was a 410ce

Tranman66 · Post by **Tranman66** » Sun Dec 19, 2004 7:20 pm

i hate the big baby, it sounds horrible, but the 100 and 200 series which range around 800$ are amazing. Its def worth the price, cuz nothing in the room compares. But (^o^) again, thats just my opinion.

CWMCALL · Post by **CWMCALL** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 8:56 am

I own a Taylor 314ce ltd. koa and a Martin D-15, it is my opinion that the less expensive Martin sounds better than the Taylor....

filmdude100cms · Post by **filmdude100cms** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 10:30 am

DJR07 wrote:
filmdude100cms wrote:yes low end taylors sound good, would i buy one, fuck no!
maybe i'm wrong, and this has nothing to do with my martin thread, but weren't you gonna buy a big baby taylor over the summer?

yes, before i started doing research, and before i realised most of the reason i wanted it was the headstock... so for about 2 weeks, it was the guitar i wanted... its just i mean 110's and 314's sound really good, its just if im buying a taylor, i want it to be a 714ce, or 914ce... thats just me, to me lower end martins are a little better than lower end taylors, like the D-15, its a really really good guitar, and itll only set ya back about $700, all mahogony, sounds great.

mangold · Post by **mangold** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:44 pm

CWMCALL wrote:I own a Taylor 314ce ltd. koa and a Martin D-15, it is my opinion that the less expensive Martin sounds better than the Taylor....

i do love the d-15, specially the all sapele one

briguy945 · Post by **briguy945** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:18 pm

I was playing some of the lower-end fender acoustics ($500-800) the other day and I was really impressed with the sound and the fretboard...might want to check those out too.....
go ahead filmdude let me have it

mangold · Post by **mangold** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:21 pm

briguy945 wrote:I was playing some of the lower-end fender acoustics ($500-800) the other day and I was really impressed with the sound and the fretboard...might want to check those out too.....
go ahead filmdude let me have it

can i too?

briguy945 · Post by **briguy945** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:30 pm

I was playing some of the lower-end fender acoustics ($500-800) the other day and I was really impressed with the sound and the fretboard...might want to check those out too.....
go ahead filmdude let me have it

can i too?

Anyone please feel free

mangold · Post by **mangold** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:31 pm

briguy945 wrote:
I was playing some of the lower-end fender acoustics ($500-800) the other day and I was really impressed with the sound and the fretboard...might want to check those out too.....
go ahead filmdude let me have it

can i too?
Anyone please feel free

well, um... o damn the moment has passed... i hope you're happy!

i dont prefer them tho (thats putting it nicely)

Tranman66 · Post by **Tranman66** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 6:09 pm

i wouldnt say lowerend fender acoustic is 500-800, more like 300.

Brock · Post by **Brock** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 6:57 pm

i like tictacs wrote:
praisedave wrote:interesting...interesting and wrong...yes thats it wrong
how is his opinion of a sound of a guitar wrong? right. get off the horse

Are you honestly reprimanding someone for criticizing an opinion?

Hey kettle!

mbgreen · Post by **mbgreen** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 7:39 pm

Tranman66 wrote:i hate the big baby, it sounds horrible, but the 100 and 200 series which range around 800$ are amazing. Its def worth the price, cuz nothing in the room compares. But (^o^) again, thats just my opinion.

The 100 and 200 series guitars are overpriced shit. Guitars in that price range in general are shitty. There aren't many good in between guitars.

The rule: If you're not going to spend at least $1200, there's no reason to spend over $400, 500 max.

i like tictacs · Post by **i like tictacs** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 8:10 pm

TrippnBill686 wrote:
i like tictacs wrote:
praisedave wrote:interesting...interesting and wrong...yes thats it wrong
how is his opinion of a sound of a guitar wrong? right. get off the horse
Are you honestly reprimanding someone for criticizing an opinion?

Hey kettle!

so its my opinion that his opinion that a sound is universally bad is wrong? the fuck?

DMBFan63 · Post by **DMBFan63** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 8:10 pm

TrippnBill686 wrote:
i like tictacs wrote:
praisedave wrote:interesting...interesting and wrong...yes thats it wrong
how is his opinion of a sound of a guitar wrong? right. get off the horse
Are you honestly reprimanding someone for criticizing an opinion?

Hey kettle!

It's not that he criticized him about the opinion, he flat out told him his opinion was wrong.

i like tictacs · Post by **i like tictacs** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 8:10 pm

mbgreen wrote:
Tranman66 wrote:i hate the big baby, it sounds horrible, but the 100 and 200 series which range around 800$ are amazing. Its def worth the price, cuz nothing in the room compares. But (^o^) again, thats just my opinion.
The 100 and 200 series guitars are overpriced shit. Guitars in that price range in general are shitty. There aren't many good in between guitars.

The rule: If you're not going to spend at least $1200, there's no reason to spend over $400, 500 max.

I disagree...I've played a few beautiful 214's, and I think they are much better then the 110's I believe, and are a good 'filler' for those who like the 314 but don't want the ES crap