new song TUNED 1.5 STEPS DOWN, IN TUNE BY THOSE STANDARDS.

Swe dmbfan · Post by **Swe dmbfan** » Wed Oct 27, 2004 8:30 pm

Ryeguy wrote:im not sure if this is a dumb question.. . but can you tell me where the chorus and verse are?

Beauford33 · Post by **Beauford33** » Wed Oct 27, 2004 8:32 pm

very nice opening riff. But definitly needs some work on the tuning. It just doesnt sound to articulate with the lower tuning.

bngholio14 · Post by **bngholio14** » Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:23 am

The opening riff sounds like a mix of fade to black, sanitarium and one by metallica.

Beauford33 · Post by **Beauford33** » Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:49 am

bngholio14 wrote:The opening riff sounds like a mix of fade to black, sanitarium and one by metallica.

I was thinking more of this one Limp Bizkit tune. FOrget whats its called but its on Chocolate Starfish and Hot Dog flavored Water.

mgoedman · Post by **mgoedman** » Wed Nov 10, 2004 12:10 am

hey i just read your thread about putin a cd together, and i gotta say that this song is a long way from being ready to put on a cd. As someone mentioned earlier, the song just has no point. I mean, the riff at the beginning sounds alright, but then after that it becomes a mix of erratic strumming on fairly typical chord voicings, which is in a word, pointless. keep working on it, and post another recording.

mangold · Post by **mangold** » Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:47 pm

its not poorly written, but poorly executed and organized. play it standard tuning, it will sound better in my opinion. you are allowed to stop strumming at some point. a well written song is a balance of noise and silence. there is potential there tho.

btw: MWR, he can "critique your critique" if he wants. you should be prepared to defend anything you say, and you were. we can have intelligent conversations regarding these songs without labeling them "arguments" PEACE EVERYONE