Song That Jane Likes Ending (chord sounds terrible)

DmbFanJason · Post by **DmbFanJason** » Sun Feb 08, 2004 3:58 am

believe it or not guys, the chord on this site is right IMO...I just think that you have to get it to a point to where it really flows and there is no hesitation between chord changes.

DustyDave · Post by **DustyDave** » Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:39 am

I always found it wrong and changed it a little bit a while ago after watching some Dave VCD's , the tab in this thread STJL Thats what it both sound like and look like to me , i used to have a video up but took it down , i'll make a new one

Coldchillin · Post by **Coldchillin** » Sun Feb 08, 2004 2:35 pm

We need clarification...NOW!

i-am-me · Post by **i-am-me** » Sun Feb 08, 2004 2:37 pm

aahhhh!! haha.

what i think is that we should just change the chord ourselves. then tell kanter. lol. its probably just a typo anyway. x54x32 or x54232. either one works for me....

DustyDave · Post by **DustyDave** » Sun Feb 08, 2004 2:44 pm

I have mentioned it to Jared , also send him a video of it , but he only wanna post up from the real videos

geekmug · Post by **geekmug** » Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:28 pm

I don't doubt Dave plays it wrong. Ahh the mindless masses. It sounds BAD. And, "you don't play it for long" "you flow" is just a crap-ass excuse for it sounding BAD. Dave is fallable afterall.

Anyways, it does sound bad, and regardless of what is accurate, I think it should be changed. As well as some other tabs on this site that would stand to sound better than "accurate," but then where do you draw the line?

DmbFanJason · Post by **DmbFanJason** » Sun Feb 08, 2004 5:10 pm

do you think that it sounds bad when Dave plays it?...I think there are other ways to play Dave's songs that would sound better to different people. Jared is just trying to give us 100% accurate tabs. You can do whatever you want with them. If you think a different chord sounds better, than throw it in there and it will all be yours and no one else's. But I think that we could all agree that the way Dave plays things is just fine, and THAT is what should be on the site to build on. Not Joe Blow's version.

i-am-me · Post by **i-am-me** » Sun Feb 08, 2004 5:53 pm

of course jason. what we're saying is that maybe kanter made a mistake on the site? a typo? maybe just saw the wrong chord from a video? i dunno...

Coldchillin · Post by **Coldchillin** » Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:25 pm

geekmug wrote:I don't doubt Dave plays it wrong. Ahh the mindless masses. It sounds BAD. And, "you don't play it for long" "you flow" is just a crap-ass excuse for it sounding BAD. Dave is fallable afterall.

Anyways, it does sound bad, and regardless of what is accurate, I think it should be changed. As well as some other tabs on this site that would stand to sound better than "accurate," but then where do you draw the line?

How is he fallable? It's his own fucking song. It's what he wrote...

i-am-me · Post by **i-am-me** » Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:38 pm

Coldchillin23222 wrote:
geekmug wrote:I don't doubt Dave plays it wrong. Ahh the mindless masses. It sounds BAD. And, "you don't play it for long" "you flow" is just a crap-ass excuse for it sounding BAD. Dave is fallable afterall.

Anyways, it does sound bad, and regardless of what is accurate, I think it should be changed. As well as some other tabs on this site that would stand to sound better than "accurate," but then where do you draw the line?
How is he fallable? It's his own fucking song. It's what he wrote...

i could make a song with a bunch of chords that are terrible and shouldn't ever be used. but htat doesn't mean that my song is wrong. its MY song. i can do whatever i want with it. the point is that we don't think KANTER put teh right chord on the site...

Coldchillin · Post by **Coldchillin** » Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:41 pm

That is an irrelevant response. I was referring to the part where he said Dave is fallable. Just because it sounds funny doesn't mean he is wrong cause he wrote it. I don't know either way if what is on the site is correct or not. I was only commenting that it's his song so he can put whatever he wants into it. I totally understand your point of questioning what jkanter put up.

i-am-me · Post by **i-am-me** » Sun Feb 08, 2004 7:26 pm

my post was quite relevant man...

Coldchillin · Post by **Coldchillin** » Sun Feb 08, 2004 7:58 pm

Nevermind. It's too annoying to explain over the net...Basically you're telling me that you're fighting that kanter put up the wrong thing, when I never mentioned that. I was only refuting that he said Dave was fallable when it's his own song...Just drop it.

i-am-me · Post by **i-am-me** » Mon Feb 09, 2004 1:06 am

okay...i wasnt arguing with you if thats what youre thinking...no hard feelings. i think there's just been a misunderstanding. i was basically backing you up.

geekmug · Post by **geekmug** » Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:07 am

Coldchillin23222 wrote:How is he fallable? It's his own fucking song. It's what he wrote...

I know, running around touting that I did it right makes it right? right?