Dave is a hypocrite

[jellyfish]

a) You've got to be kidding me.
b) That was my first post in this thread. I wasn't an asshole. Nice try, though. B+ for effort.
c) If some guy came into a bar and said something ridiculous, knowing that it was ridiculous, just to start a fight, would you really stand there and defend his position? Of course you wouldn't. You just look for anything to make you think that you have a leg up on everyone here in the maturity department. It's what you've done for months now.

Ding ding ding, we have a winner!

Are we at a bar?

[onid41]

lemme get a captain and coke...

[Speenis]

a) You've got to be kidding me.
b) That was my first post in this thread. I wasn't an asshole. Nice try, though. B+ for effort.
c) If some guy came into a bar and said something ridiculous, knowing that it was ridiculous, just to start a fight, would you really stand there and defend his position? Of course you wouldn't. You just look for anything to make you think that you have a leg up on everyone here in the maturity department. It's what you've done for months now.

Ding ding ding, we have a winner!

Are we at a bar?

Yeah, and they better have Killians or else I'm out.

[jellyfish]

Im pouring it now, let me finish off this scotch first.

[jellyfish]

And for people like Brock who don't understand, he wanted to debate the subject. Which is what he meant by starting an argument. When most people debate they don't come out immediately calling people names.

Idiot.

[jsgksu]

and you guys wonder and make threads about "where are the new people" yet you shit on and gang up on everyone with 30 or less posts. 95% of the people who post here are regulars. It was a dumb question but leave the guy alone....three pages of "you're an idiot".......

That's why these are now the worst boards on the net.

we dont shit on everyone w/ 30 or less posts, we do on dumb asses who post stupid questions and who deserve a kick in the mouth.Period.

Go look in the ndmb section. Where Sarah had made a thread about "Who likes to ...." I didn't see anybody giving her shit for such a rediculous waste of bandwidth. Is that because she has a high post count? Who knows, but double standards do exist here.

i didnt even see that. anyway, double standars do exist, but it's just a pussy/not-pussy thing.
that's what i see, but i could be wrong

WHat the hell does pussy/not-pussy mean? It's real simple, he didn't fully understand Dave's quote about mass clear cutting of forests. Most people don't undertsand that this occurs, but to call him an idiot is just rediculous.
Ya'll should be ashamed of yourselves.

From his first post:

.....I am trying to get an argument going

Still doesn't explain why you need to be an asshole.

I know we jump on peoples shit sometimes too soon. But defending this guy is hilarious. He came right out and say hes trying to make an arguement. If hes really as smart and old as he claims he is, he would have enough common sense to know that Dave playing a guitar and him having a stance on saving rainforests does not come close to making him a hypocrite. He said he wanted to get an arguement, so people started arguing with him saying hes an idiot and so is his comment. Theyre argying with him, just like he wanted. He wanted attention and he got it and your defending him. Hes not ignorant, he knew what he was doing and got the rise out of people that he wanted. No reason to defend him.

[bassman462]

and you guys wonder and make threads about "where are the new people" yet you shit on and gang up on everyone with 30 or less posts. 95% of the people who post here are regulars. It was a dumb question but leave the guy alone....three pages of "you're an idiot".......

That's why these are now the worst boards on the net.

we dont shit on everyone w/ 30 or less posts, we do on dumb asses who post stupid questions and who deserve a kick in the mouth.Period.

Go look in the ndmb section. Where Sarah had made a thread about "Who likes to ...." I didn't see anybody giving her shit for such a rediculous waste of bandwidth. Is that because she has a high post count? Who knows, but double standards do exist here.

i didnt even see that. anyway, double standars do exist, but it's just a pussy/not-pussy thing.
that's what i see, but i could be wrong

WHat the hell does pussy/not-pussy mean? It's real simple, he didn't fully understand Dave's quote about mass clear cutting of forests. Most people don't undertsand that this occurs, but to call him an idiot is just rediculous.
Ya'll should be ashamed of yourselves.

From his first post:

.....I am trying to get an argument going

Still doesn't explain why you need to be an asshole.

I know we jump on peoples shit sometimes too soon. But defending this guy is hilarious. He came right out and say hes trying to make an arguement. If hes really as smart and old as he claims he is, he would have enough common sense to know that Dave playing a guitar and him having a stance on saving rainforests does not come close to making him a hypocrite. He said he wanted to get an arguement, so people started arguing with him saying hes an idiot and so is his comment. Theyre argying with him, just like he wanted. He wanted attention and he got it and your defending him. Hes not ignorant, he knew what he was doing and got the rise out of people that he wanted. No reason to defend him.

exactly

[onid41]

the noobs and the non-regulars that usually get bashed pretty much say the dumbest stuff, then everyone just jumps on them. I don't think this is the worst boards on the net... well its the only one i post on so i guess i wouldn't know.

[jsgksu]

And for people like Brock who don't understand, he wanted to debate the subject. Which is what he meant by starting an argument. When most people debate they don't come out immediately calling people names.

Idiot.

He didnt want to debate anything, its pretty obvious.

[whatshername]

only thing im saying is that if someone is gonna get pissed about cutting down trees (Dave), they shouldn't be holding something and using something everyday thats from a tree.

that's like saying if someone is going to get pissed about people starving over in ethiopia then they shouldn't leave ANY food left on their plate ever. or, they shouldn't even eat.

you're stupid dude.

[jsgksu]

only thing im saying is that if someone is gonna get pissed about cutting down trees (Dave), they shouldn't be holding something and using something everyday thats from a tree.

that's like saying if someone is going to get pissed about people starving over in ethiopia then they shouldn't leave ANY food left on their plate ever. or, they shouldn't even eat.

you're stupid dude.

thank you, a good analogy

[a1075dd63aa12]

only thing im saying is that if someone is gonna get pissed about cutting down trees (Dave), they shouldn't be holding something and using something everyday thats from a tree.

that's like saying if someone is going to get pissed about people starving over in ethiopia then they shouldn't leave ANY food left on their plate ever. or, they shouldn't even eat.

you're stupid dude.

thank you, a good analogy

[whatshername]

And for people like Brock who don't understand, he wanted to debate the subject. Which is what he meant by starting an argument. When most people debate they don't come out immediately calling people names.

Idiot.

He didnt want to debate anything, its pretty obvious.

yeah. and even if that WAS his intention, it would have been a stupid and worthless debate. but i'm sticking to the theory that he didn't want to debate at all.

[jellyfish]

Damn.

[Lbacker]

Thats a great analogy. I guess that sums it up. Your exactly right, I wasn't looking to debate anything, but it sure got people fired up.