I'll add to the lovefest......very solid job fellas. I'm thoroughly impressed, as it must have been hard to coordinate all of this and do separate parts via internet.
Roastbeef wrote:This guy I work with has been recording things for years and he told me that whatever you do, be sure each part has it's own "location" in the stereo field.
I will humbly agree with your friend. But, hard panning = bad. It's much more effective to go (track) -> (5ms delay to one side) -> (reverb) .. than to do any crazy with copying the track and doing a wet-side and dry-side.. maybe it would be cool if it was like 25% panned out, though.
I'm Finally back, and ...ugh... You guys finished without me!
Sorry, Roastbeef, about my mis-read of how you wanted my recording posted. I wish I could have been in on it. hmph....well, maybe if you want to start up another one, put me down for, anything!
Cor wrote:I'm Finally back, and ...ugh... You guys finished without me!
Sorry, Roastbeef, about my mis-read of how you wanted my recording posted. I wish I could have been in on it. hmph....well, maybe if you want to start up another one, put me down for, anything!
Cory "up for anything" Allen
Yeah. I'm sorry man. I wanted to press ahead with this though as it was starting to drag out. We'll definitely let you know about the next one if we do this again.
JaDaRu wrote:it must have been hard to coordinate all of this and do separate parts via internet.
It actually worked out surprisingly well, although we did learn a few things. i.e. it makes things much easier if all tracks are zeroed in relation to one another, as well as defining a sampling rate and whether to record in stereo or mono...
damn...that was fuckin great...I got chills during the first chorus...I'd like to reiterate the fact that Miguel, jesus your voice, wow...and roastbeef you did a great job on vocals too...all the instruments were done extremely well...Dave would be proud.