Fishman Acoustic Matrix Natural I or II?

mikeb · Post by **mikeb** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:06 pm

For a Martin D-15, what would be the one to go with?

Yakko · Post by **Yakko** » Sun Feb 04, 2007 5:19 pm

I have the natural I. I like the Natural II a lot though. If you have the money, go for the more expensive one.

mikeb · Post by **mikeb** » Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:10 pm

They are both the same price...

mangold · Post by **mangold** » Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:00 pm

why limiting yourself to fishman? what about bband or lrbaggs

Yakko · Post by **Yakko** » Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:16 pm

mikeb wrote:They are both the same price...

When I went shopping for them, the Nat. II was like $40 dollars more than the Nat. I

Lbacker · Post by **Lbacker** » Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:05 pm

mangold wrote:why limiting yourself to fishman? what about bband or lrbaggs

Grasso · Post by **Grasso** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:47 pm

It depends on your guitar and how you'll be playing it.

When i bought mine for my chet, i got the high output one, and the other wasn't as high output....i don't really remember which was which, but play with a band alot so....

Fishman's website says what body types fit the pickup best, but i heard the higher output was better for amping with a band so i got it, havn't been disappointed

mikeb · Post by **mikeb** » Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:03 pm

I had the natural I installed this week, it sounds fantastic, I am totally happy.

Thanks for the advice.